Talk amongst yourselves. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. Reduced gun ownership, or rather, the reduction in the proliferation of firearms, does decrease firearm deaths, which is the whole point of gun control. It happened in 2005 during the Katrina aftermath. They can charge all the transfer fees they like. 74 votes, 23 comments. Welcome to /r/HuntsvilleTribune. The Dems brilliant panacea to the spike in crime is to pass a sweeping law that would effectively require hunting buddies, neighbors, and family members to visit an FFL ( and pay the transfer fee! Universal Background Checks: What doesn't work, and what can. It's really just a statistics issue: Let's say nobody was required to wear seatbelts. It happened in 2005 during the Katrina aftermath. Universal background checks have enjoyed wide, bipartisan support. Exactly. And mass confiscation isn't the only way a registry could be abused. You're asking a business in charge of making money to voluntarily make less money? Universal background checks can’t be enforced without a registry. The House of Representatives has passed a bipartisan bill that would mandate universal background checks Thursday by a vote of 227-203, with eight Republicans joining all … It seems to me things like that should be viewed on what they actually do and not what you're afraid of them becoming. Joe Biden, the half-wit, condescendingly called us "the black helicopter crowd" for opposing registration. So-called “universal” background checks have become a go-to gun control push for anti-Second Amendment politicians. what other reason for registration exists except future confiscation? You'd be surprised to find out how many people choose to wear seatbelts because it's a law enforcement issue rather than a safety issue. How would the seller know that it's not a straw purchase? The more honest gun control advocates on this site will admit as much. You can disagree with the premise, but the logic from there makes sense. They're between options that all have positives and negatives and hopefully the best option is chosen, but that doesn't mean that the lesser option will cause devastation in it's wake. How would the seller know who got the code? We can see one example of this problem in the Commonwealth of Virginia. We reported yesterday that California Democrat Mike Thompson had resurrected a ‘popular’ Universal Background Checks bill, H.R. A 2018 Gallup poll found that 92% of voters supported requiring background checks for … When we first started reselling them about 4 months ago, the customer would fill out the form, we'd call NICS, and we'd give them the information provided on the form. Universal background checks on guns are only meant to turn law-abiding citizens into criminals. Universal background checks would require most private purchases to run through the same background check process required for licensed dealers. It doesn't help solve or prevent crimes, unless they register a spent slug and casing from every gun. This is shitty debating and you know it. “Universal Background Checks” are just a good first stepping stone. What are these $200 guns, and where are they? Once passed, laws are very rarely repealed. They fill out the form, we type that info into the online portal. Don't give them your business, find an ffl that will do it cheaper. If you assume increased gun ownership results in decreased public safety, doesn't it follow that making it onerous to own a gun and driving down gun ownership would increase public safety? But new research has questioned the policy’s effectiveness. But then again, now is as good a time as any to talk about measures that could affect the killings where that is not the case. It just makes people who are poorer less likely to buy firearms. registration led to the police breaking into houses. Why do you say that it won't happen? Universal Background Screening is a leading provider of comprehensive employment background checks including county, state and federal criminal record checks, verifications of past employment, education, professional licenses and certification, searches of government and … FACTA Notice: Consumers may request a free annual file disclosure pursuant to the Free Annual File Disclosure Rule, 16 C.F.R. Because that slippery slope has already had it's way with firearms owners in the United States under the soft-sounding deceit of "compromise." Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. Furthermore, gun registries have been leaked/hacked opening up owners to increased crime risk (or opening up non-owners). what is inside Democrats’ Universal Background Checks Bill, HR.8. 161k members in the progun community. But I'm fine with background checks as long as there are no fees or record-keeping. The site may not work properly if you don't, If you do not update your browser, we suggest you visit, Press J to jump to the feed. Mosin nagants? 8 ‘Universal Background Checks’ Bill And H.R. Nina, that's a good question. Private transactions at gun shows or through websites like Armslist would still be possible, but more complicated. I'm as pro-gun as they come. That the person taking the gun actually passed the check? No law that requires background checks but prohibits recordkeeping can actually do so. This is not just a hypothetical slippery slope deal, it's a real concern, that's happened throughout recent history, numerous times. Every now and then, we have to delay it for 3 business days. I've been thinking about what kind of answer I wanted to give for a few hours now. I'd actually love to see it enacted to rob the anti-gunners of their only decent talking point. In theory, the Democrats should be absolutely against the idea that a Constitutional right would be levied into a means for corporations and … An additional 5 percent of respondents said they did not have an opinion or don't know. Overall, 84 percent of voters support universal background checks, while just 11 percent oppose the policy. California's gun registration led to tracking down legal gun owners and taking their guns, or jailing them. It's not because they might be mandatory, but there are current laws making them mandatory when they happen. Recent mass shootings have renewed debate about universal background checks. Just remember, our Revolution didn't start because of high taxes, or a tea party, or even when British troops lined up and killed Crispus Attucks, but only when the British troops marched to Lexington and Concord to confiscate weapons they knew about did our Revolution actually start. Situations like this story are why we protect the 2nd Amendment. Universal background checks for gun buyers have widespread support. And those are just within the last few years. Early Brought up an interesting point yesterday. Breaking: House Passes H.R. The vast majority of things that we debate will never cause the "sky to fall". We are not … Seatbelt preventable deaths would rise. Universal background checks are corporatism, or if you want to be extremely specific, corporatocracy. I do know though that in Massachusetts private sales have to be registered, and the sky hasn't fallen. Boebert’s observation comes on the very day on which the Democrat-run House of Representatives is scheduled to take up Rep. Mike Thompson’s (D-CA) universal background check legislation. — Lauren Boebert (@laurenboebert) March 10, 2021. Decision within seconds. Looks like you're using new Reddit on an old browser. —Tom Vaughan, MD is a neuroradiologist in private practice in Louisville, KY. How does the dealer other than the buyer answering "no" on the form? There were similar arguments about "smart guns": people were against them because they didn't want them to become mandated. Or they could pass new bullshit laws to disqualify people, like get a DUI - lose your guns. Want to know why universal background checks don’t work? Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. As a California resident, I'm subject to a universal background check system in almost every case of receiving a gun. For anyone who doesn't understand why registration/record-keeping is a non-starter, think of the NSA. Universal background checks have enjoyed wide, bipartisan support. On that same day, the House passed H.R. 8.. There were similar arguments about "smart guns": people were against them because they didn't want them to become mandated. Because now it's not legislated with punishment in the act of not wearing a seatbelt. I completely agree. Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-TX), an NRA-backed gun-rights advocate, dismissed calls for universal background checks even after a mass shooting in his own state that might have been prevented by such a law. They are only interested in background checks as a vehicle to sneak through registration (and other restrictions if they can get away with it). That's not hypothetical. Why is that exactly? Do you believe every business shouldn't keep records of its sales, or just gun stores? If we take away all the rhetoric about "the gun show loophole" and universal background checks, they don't have a leg to stand on. There seems to be a lot of confusion and frustration around background checks. Yep, I said it. That's my thought process at least. How would the seller know who got the code. She said, and I'm paraphrasing, "if anyone is against universal background checks, then I want to know why?" 9 members in the HuntsvilleTribune community. The universal background check legislation was introduced in March by Rep. Mike Thompson, D-Calif., who is chair of the House Gun Violence … They have lost right after right after right like that, so they're done "compromising. Universal Background checks are nothing but a building block in this scheme. There were similar arguments about "smart guns": people were against them because they didn't want them to become mandated. Discussion about politics. It's $25, and that's only a limit on the state fees for background checks. His reasoning: he wants to be able to arm his friends. I don't have a strong opinion on a registry either way, and opening up the NICS to everyone seems like common sense. It could be during a local emergency (the authorities confiscated legally owned guns after Hurricane Katrina). It's not rocket surgery. are current laws making them mandatory when they happen. Those are the transactions that universal background checks would putatively target because licensed dealers are required by existing law to run a background check. Here’s how they’ve worked in Colorado. As someone who reviews background checks, I … A 2018 Gallup poll found that 92% of voters supported requiring background checks for all gun sales, more than almost every other gun control measure.. Isn't $20 the maximum allowable ffl fee? New Jersey already has a law on the books mandating "smart guns" as soon as they're available. Universal background checks are a crucial foundation for a strong system of gun safety laws that will help reduce gun violence and save lives. The research, however, suggests that Congress should go … 99% of the time, they'd Allow it or Deny it right away. The idea keeps getting shot down in Congress, though, for reasons I am not quite sure about. How would the seller know that it's not a straw purchase? Don't give them your business, find an ffl that will do it cheaper. Americas1stfreedom.org – Universal Background Checks Unenforceable Without Gun Registry. Who knows what the environment will be like years down the road. The laws aren't about public safety, they're about making it more onerous to be a gun owner, in order to drive gun ownership down. each time the NRA and gun owners have vehemently roared it down, because it does indeed create a registry and people aren't a fan of that. If universal background checks pass, it will artificially raise the age to buy a handgun across the country to 21. It doesn't do anything to reduce crime. Part 610, by calling 1-877-263-8033 and selecting option 2, or by sending a written request to Universal Background Screening, Post Office Box 5920, Scottsdale, AZ 85261.Consumers may check the status of their request by calling 1-877-263-8033 and selecting … Can't the shop choose to charge less for their ffl fee? "Side note: With universal background checks, I wouldn't be able to let my friends borrow my handgun when they travel alone like this," Dan Crenshaw tweeted. There is no way for the public to meaningfully have a guard against recordkeeping, except by not requiring background checks. For pro-gun advocacy! To the point of being a single-issue voter and an endowment member of the NRA. Prior to WWII Hitler used gun registration to track down Jewish gun owners. Now, we just set it up to do it online. Given that over 90% of the population supports universal background checks, it is shameful to ignore their opinion. There is a bottom end to that, and it's around 40-50 dollars. But mainly, a universal background check cannot be enforced on its own. Huntsville Tribune | Real News network is based on facts. 8 , the Bipartisan Background Checks Act of 202 1 by a vote of 227-203. Don't like it? Alabama AGTwitter Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia … First, channel all gun sales through a background check, second, create a registration database from the information, third and most important, expand incrementally and continuously on the lists of prohibited persons until everybody with a parking ticket is prohibited. Given these statistics, a universal background check seems like a solution to the issue of gun violence in the United States. You're not the first to propose this. (This is GA by the way). Ms. I … Operation Chokepoint, IRS scandal, NSA surveillance, etc. BOOM. The choices aren't between "Utter pandemonium" and "pure bliss" on almost anything. Even in Canada, registration led to the police breaking into houses during a natural disaster and confiscating guns, using up resources that could have saved lives. I could imagine a state like CA or NJ trying to pull that shit. So, let’s get this straight. On what basis do you conclude that its unlikely? 1446 ‘Mandatory Waiting Periods’ — The Real Fight Begins In The Senate By staff Just hours ago, the House voted to pass H.R. President Donald Trump has floated the idea of seeking expanded background checks on the federal level and also for legislation on so … After Sandy Hook Senator Coburn proposed opening NICS to the public for universal background checks. That the person taking the gun actually passed the check? They come out of the woodwork to push such checks each time a … First off, criminals don’t go through the legal process – they already get their guns through other means. This bill, filed during the 2019/2020 legislative session moved quickly through the Democrat controlled House but was stalled out by a Republican Senate and the Corona Scare narrowing the focus of the legislative session. they get a simple go/no go once they input the code. I work in a pawn shop, and we just started selling guns again (they stopped selling them like 7 years ago, I don't know why). He is a shooting enthusiast who believes in individual liberty and personal responsibility. More posts from the RuralNewsNetwork community, Alabama AGTwitter Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada Hampshire New Jersey Mexico York North Carolina Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island Farm Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington trump Wisconsin Wyoming Politics Senate 2022, Press J to jump to the feed. No, there is nothing at all "universal" about the proposed background check — and nothing reasonable about legislation that doesn't include criminals and the mentally disturbed in its "universe." Why? but is it a good enough reason to be against something just because of what it could hypothetically lead to in the future. I'm fine with background checks as long as there are no fees or record-keeping. They have no business keeping track of everyone's guns. I will go on the record to say this system is not only terrible, but ineffective. But the government has proven over and over that we are justified in not trusting them. ", New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, More posts from the PoliticalDiscussion community, Continue browsing in r/PoliticalDiscussion.
Waterside Towers Floor Plans, Downtown Significado En Español, Camden Work Release, Fxu Whats On, Do Co-op Kills Count Towards Challenges, Lily Name Puns, Rabie Ridge Directions,
